Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the
protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human
population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In contemporary society, there's a debate surrounding the allocation of resources towards the conservation of wildlife versus directing these funds towards addressing human-centric issues. while some argue that the substantial investment in protecting wild animals should be redirected towards human populations, I firmly disagree with this viewpoint.
Firstly, the protection of wild animals is vital for maintaining ecological balance and biodiversity. ecosystems rely on a delicate balance between species, and the disappearance of any one species can have profound repercussions on the environment. preserving wildlife isn't just an ethical concern but also crucial for the sustenance of the planet's ecosystems, which ultimately benefit humans by providing clean air, water, and natural resources necessary for survival.
Moreover, investments in wildlife conservation often yield positive outcomes for human well-being. For instance, wildlife tourism generates substantial revenue, contributing to local economies and providing employment opportunities. Additionally, conservation efforts often involve scientific research, leading to discoveries that can have implications for human medicine, agriculture, and technology.
Redirecting funds from wildlife protection to human-centric issues may seem pragmatic, but it neglects the interconnectedness of ecosystems and human welfare. neglecting wildlife conservation could result in irreversible damage to the environment, leading to long-term consequences for humanity, including habitat loss, resource depletion, and increased vulnerability to natural disasters.
In conclusion, while addressing human needs is crucial, the preservation of wild animals should not be undervalued or overlooked. The conservation of wildlife is not just a moral obligation but also a strategic investment in the planet's future, benefiting both ecosystems and human societies in the long run. balancing both conservation efforts and addressing human-centric issues remains imperative for the sustainable well-being of our planet and its inhabitants.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-05 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-03 | abid1 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Afdalah Harris | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | mynguyen001 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Linhdung | 73 | view |
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- Some people think that in order to prevent illness and disease governments should make efforts in reducing environmental pollutions and housing problems To what extent do you agree to disagree with this statement 84
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000
- Nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries What are the reasons for this problem What are the effects on society 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
In contemporary society, theres a debate surrounding the allocation of ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...owards addressing human-centric issues. while some argue that the substantial investm...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ecosystems
...ng ecological balance and biodiversity. ecosystems rely on a delicate balance between spec...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 251, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Preserving
...found repercussions on the environment. preserving wildlife isnt just an ethical concern b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 271, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...on the environment. preserving wildlife isnt just an ethical concern but also crucia...
^^^^
Line 10, column 160, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Neglecting
...edness of ecosystems and human welfare. neglecting wildlife conservation could result in i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 310, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Balancing
...ms and human societies in the long run. balancing both conservation efforts and addressin...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.54121863799 5.12529762239 128% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49766433288 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0404642858 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.384615385 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122636079635 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524996252359 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654734811371 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0750419592052 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492866079578 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 16.32 50.2224549098 32% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 20.65 12.4159519038 166% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.36 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.