The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The first bar chart shows the number of couples who married and divorced in the United States of America from 1970 to 2000, while the second bar chart illustrates the percentage of marital status of adult Americans in 1970 and 2000.
In general, the number of people who had married reduced during the 30 years, which divorced couples had a plateaued trend from 1970 to 2000. The situation of adult people except married groups was no longer significant.
As can be seen, the number of married people was 2.5 million for two consecutive years and after that in two remaining years fell about 0.5 million. The number of couples who decided to divorce increased by around 0.4 million in 1980, which decreased by approximately 0.3 million and returned again to the same place that was 1970 in 2000. The percentage of the never-married group was under 20 percent which, the married group is massive raise in 1970 to 70 percent that in 2000 drop nearly 10 percent and other two groups no longer significant.
As a result, there were a downward trend and fluctuation trend in married and divorce rates and the percentage of adult people who got married significantly was higher than other groups in the United State of America.
- The working week should be shorter and workers should have longer weekend Do you agree or disagree 56
- The charts below give information on the location and types of the dance classes young people in a town in Australia are currently attending Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The plans below show a harbor in 2000 and how it looks today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, while, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80568720379 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51679741363 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497630331754 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.955490393 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.857142857 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1428571429 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157674110319 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819873652518 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569626108983 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109254066064 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617079275834 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.