More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern lifestyle which cannot be treated with modern medicines. Some people think that a return to traditional medicine should be encouraged.
To what extent do you agree?
More individuals are suffering from health problems unresponsive to modern medications as a result of the contemporary lifestyle. Therefore, some people believe that traditional medicine should be returned to use. I disagree with this opinion and will explain in this essay.
Traditional medicine is made of natural resources such as plants or herbs, but in today’s time, the purity of these ingredients cannot be protected due to the contamination stemming from environmental issues. Thus, this will affect the effectiveness of traditional medicine, rendering it ineffective in treating ailments. The efficacy of medicinal plants is influenced by current environmental problems, including polluted water or contaminated soil. Mint, for example, is a tree famous for curing fever. If being planted in polluted soil, it could lose its medicinal effects, wrecking havoc on people’s health instead of providing treatment.
The increase in incurable health conditions does not result from the inadequacy of modern medicine, but is due to current unhealthy living habits. If people want to prevent themselves from incurable chronic diseases, they need to change their lifestyles first. If they do not attempt to do so, traditional or modern medicine could not save their lives from these diseases. Therefore, there is no need to encourage the use of traditional medicine when people already live healthily. Living healthier can improve people’s mentality and health significantly without too much reliance on natural or artificial medications. For instance, people who engage in excessive tobacco use face a high risk of lung cancer, diminishing their prospects for survival.
In conclusion, I believe that the revival of traditional medicine is unnecessary since its effectiveness cannot be preserved due to the increasing environmental pollution nowadays. Furthermore, traditional or modern medicine will be rendered useless in curing untreatable chronic diseases if people have no intention of pursuing healthy lifestyles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-14 | reverjae | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-05 | bicnguyenn02 | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-05 | bicnguyenn02 | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-05 | bicnguyenn02 | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-21 | dang3cvt | 81 | view |
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting this main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009 73
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77333333333 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1689886224 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593333333333 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4081209905 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.25 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398190249768 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121849865394 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868136547141 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247594053246 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074466078974 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.