Convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The consumption of convenience foods is predicted to be more populated and this trend will replace the way people cook their food as well as traditional foods. In my opinion, I do not agree with this statement. People are considering what they eat more than before and the taste of traditional foods cannot be found in processed food.
Firstly, traditional foods allow people to tailor and be creative in the way they cook, which may not be possible with ready-made foods. There is a fixed ingredient recipe and the process of making convenience foods is the same. However, people often use fresh ingredients to cook, and they also change ingredients based on their regional characteristics or hobbies. For example, there is a cake in Vietnam, which is called Banh Xeo. People in different regions in Vietnam make it in different ways. In the center of Vietnam, the cake is small and they often eat it with slices of meat,shrimp, and lettuce. Meanwhile, in the south of Vietnam, people usually make a bigger cake and eat it with various ingredients like shrimp, duck, meat, squid, snail, and up to ten types of vegetables.
Secondly, people are more mindful of their food choices than before. They prefer homemade food to processed foods. There are many concerns about the nutrition or even the preservatives commonly found in convenience foods. Manufacturers need to consider the shelf-life of the foods so that there are many preservatives added to ready-made foods to keep their shelf-life longer. Moreover, looking at the ingredients in the container of the foods, there is more food flavoring used than fresh ingredients. In my case, I bought a bowl of instant soup, which is advertised as containing shrimp, the amount of shrimp flavor is more than that of shrimp.
To conclude, I strongly believe that consuming convenience foods cannot become the most popular trend and they cannot replace traditional foods.
- The table illustrates the percentages of three age groups of spectators watching different TV programs 78
- The table illustrates the percentages of three age groups of spectators watching different TV programs 73
- WATER CONSUMPTION 78
- GALLERY 78
- Some believe that people today have no interest in maintaining the traditional culture of their country or region Other believe that it is still important to people that we preserve a traditional way of life Discuss both these views and give your own opin 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... convenience foods is the same. However, people often use fresh ingredients to co...
^^
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , shrimp
...nd they often eat it with slices of meat,shrimp, and lettuce. Meanwhile, in the south o...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 753, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s like shrimp, duck, meat, squid, snail, and up to ten types of vegetables. Se...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06289308176 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81051864797 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493710691824 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0217069129 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7058823529 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7058823529 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293476017067 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105400312491 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955182766206 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220091465069 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123933296001 0.056905535591 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.