Convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In modern days, convenience foods have become more and more widespread among people, especially the young thanks to its convenience and portable aspect. It is argued that this type of food will become a replacement of traditional foods and traditional preparation methods. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this statement due to some reasons which presented this essay.
First and foremost, tertiary processed foods can not provide adequate nutritions for consumers. It is the fact that convenience foods might be ready to eat without any further preparation and have long shell life. However, this is the main cause of nutrition leaking during processing time. In a long time before being unpacked and consumed, the nutrition in foods are vanished and even turn into poisonous substances.Moreover, to keep tertiary processed foods tasty and fresh-like condition, the producers have to add some preservatives, which is not good for human's health if using in long term.
Secondly, convenience foods can not provide users experience in cooking and tasting like traditional foods and cooking methods do. With many people, preparing and cooking a delicious meal, then enjoy it is irreplaceable with packed foods. Moreover, the formalistic and the original taste of hand-made food is the main value that packed foods can not bring to people. Traditional foods preparation methods helps people adjust flavor and appearance of dishes as the way they want and appropriate to their own taste.
In conclusion, convenience foods can not be a prevalent replacement of traditional foods or foods preparation methods due to its lack of nutrition and negative effects to people's health as well as not having the ability of satisfy people with their own taste.
- Convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- Many young children today leave school with a negative attitude towards learning Why is this happening What can be done to encourage young people to have a positive attitude towards learning 59
- Do you think it is better for students to work before their university study Why Use reasons and specific examples to support your choice 56
- Do you think it is better for students to work before their university study Why Use reasons and specific examples to support your choice 56
- Many young children today leave school with a negative attitude towards learning Why is this happening What can be done to encourage young people to have a positive attitude towards learning 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 418, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...and even turn into poisonous substances.Moreover, to keep tertiary processed foods tasty...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'foods'' or 'food's'?
Suggestion: foods'; food's
...ds can not bring to people. Traditional foods preparation methods helps people adjust...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30935251799 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96076162746 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546762589928 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5290436032 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474830092866 0.244688304435 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184318276562 0.084324248473 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13267647846 0.0667982634062 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312606074131 0.151304729494 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101872005955 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.