Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Is it a positive or negative trend?
Children using mobile phones has been one of phenomenon in todays world. Numerous children use smartphones more than an hour in a day. This essay will address the root of this problem. I personaly consider that this habit has drawbacks for children health and development.
Many children use devices, such as smartphone excesively. This is mainly because of their parents are unaware about the consequences brought by this habit to their children. Parents gave the mobile phones to their children to console them while they do their jobs as they do not want to be disturbed by their children. The Ministry of Social Work of the Republic of Indonesia reported that in 2022, more than a half of parents in the country allowed their children to play with their phones to entertain them. This implies that majority of parent in the country has low awareness related to the negative sides of smartphones for their children, and this is becoming the primary factor contributing to more and more children use mobile phone.
Although the usage of mobile phone can have some beneficial for children, such as learning new languages or gain information. I personally consider that this device is dangerous for children. Children using smartphone more than one hour in a day have a higher possibility to suffer eyes problems. Furthermore, studies have also reported that children who are given access to mobile phones are likely to experience tantrum in comparison to the children who have not access to the devices.
To sum up, the principal factor contributing to overused of smartphones by children is less awareness of parents about the downsides of this devices for their children. I think that children using smartphone excesively have more risk to suffer eye problems and tantrum.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-02-22 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
- Film stars and celebrities often share their views on public matters that have little to do with their profession Is this a positive or negative development 61
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe that money should be spend on improving existing public transport Discuss both the 61
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
- The charts show what Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- the graph below illustrates internet users as percentage of population in the countries usa canada and mexico between 1999 to 2009 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...eness of parents about the downsides of this devices for their children. I think tha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, so, while, i think, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07167235495 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71403386157 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484641638225 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4661362683 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301505134555 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126559796043 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544486430698 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205678948572 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033283609341 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.