The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne, Australia for the period 2000 to 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The given line chart depicts the numbers of partakers in distinctive activities at one social centre located in Melbourne of Australia in the period of 20 years from 2000 to 2020.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the participants for all activities increased to varying degrees except in terms of martial arts and amateur dramatics. It is also noticeable that film club was the most prevalent activities for all participants in Australia throughout 20 years and other activities also grown significantly.
Regarding the number of people involved in film club, it began at roughly 65 in 2000, then declined to 60 after a decade which rebounded to 60 in 2015 and reached a peak at approximately 68 in the final year. Turning to martial arts, there are about 37 people engaged in this activity in 2000 and from 2005 onward, it observed a fluctuation from approximately 33 to 37 and finally the figure was accounted for around 37, which is identical to the figure in the first year.
The remaining activities started the period lower with 27 participants for amateur drama, 18 for table tennis, and 0 for musical performances. Over the next 10 years, amateur dramatics witnessed a dramatical decline that would just end at about 5 in 2020. Meanwhile, table tennis and musical performance witnessed an upward trend and the figure for table tennis was double musical performance after a decade with the figure being recorded at 20 and 10 correspondingly. From 2010 onward, the number of participants of table tennis soared sharply and finally ended at about 52, which was higher than the figure of musical performance by 40 in 2020.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | LauraTing | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-06 | bassmodulators123 | 67 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | bassmodulators123 | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-14 | dorae | 73 | view |
- Some people think that governments should spend money on providing faster means of public transport Other people think there are more priorities for public transport e g costs environment safety Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some argue that music mainly serves as a way for individuals to reduce their stress and anxiety To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, look, regarding, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 278.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98920863309 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90779450416 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521582733813 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 283.868780488 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.5310428203 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.111111111 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8888888889 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240675382251 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111847389256 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752515497028 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164672565782 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070204507102 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.