The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of the Japanese tourist market.
The bar chart illustrates the number of Japanese travelers having international trip between 1985 and 1995 and Australia’s share of the Japanese tourist market.
Overview, it is obvious that the number of Japanese traveling abroad increased to varying degree except 1991 with the decline in number of Japanese visitors. Additionally, the proportion of Japanese visiting to Australia fluctuated consistently in the period of 10 years.
Looking closely at the bar chart, there was roughly 5 million Japanese traveling abroad in 1985 and rose to just over 7 million people in Japan traveling internationally. In 1990, the figure for traveling abroad Japanese increased to a double figure compared to the figure in 1985, at over 10% and declined to just over 10% in 1991. Notably, the number of Japanese having international trip grew to the same figure (at 12%) and finally reached a peak at approximately 15% in 1995.
According to the line chart, the percentage of Japanese choosing Australia as a destination to travel started at 2% in 1985, its figure then witnessed a substantial increase to roughly 5% in 1989 and fell to just over 4% in 1990. From 1990 onward, the ratio of Japanese traveling to Australian ranged from about 5% to 6%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-16 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-19 | Guiseppe59192 | view | |
| 2022-10-04 | 12345645sa454xs | view | |
| 2022-05-29 | Dhvani Bhanushali | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-08 | sazna | 100 | view |
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features of the graph and make comparisons where relevant 61
- It is important for everyone including young people to save money for their future To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The picture illustrates the disparity of a park named Grange Park between 1920 and today 73
- The table and pie chart gives information about the population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas 67
- The graph below shows the percentage of the Australian workforce in five industries between 1962 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, look, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06829268293 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97454599138 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526829268293 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2949082777 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.875 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448398550746 0.215688989381 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.215037871557 0.103423049105 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168081644094 0.0843802449381 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328657635269 0.15604864568 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.182957318027 0.0819641961636 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.