The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with prediction for 2030 and 2040.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the percentage of people congestion in four different Asian countries between 1970 and 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040.
It is obvious that Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia have an upward trend thoroughly in the period even in prediction. There was a fluctuating trend in the Philippines. The prediction shows the percentage of the population in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Thailand will be near to each other. Indonesia across other two countries and passed them, the point is that Malaysia has the largest population among others.
As can be seen, by 1970 Although the minimum percentage was about Indonesia near a quarter it increased and in 2000 reached Thailand which both of them have raised. This country across the Philippines too by 2010 of about 40% and increased until 2040 by 60%. There was three decades went up consecutively, then four decades leveled until 2020 and forecasting shows reach to nearly 45% in 2040. Malaysia increased sharply until 2040 from 29% to around 81% which is the maximum percentage. By 1990 the rate of population in the Philippines was more than Malaysia but decreased in three decades and then will rise again by forecasting.
In conclusion, the point is all countries increased their population and this continue till 2040 but these people need to row material that should be provided and governments set roles.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean Island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows how a biofuel called is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- The charts below show the percentage of electricity consumed by di erent sectors in Eastern Australia in 2007 and 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be provided and governments set roles.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1174.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12663755459 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81503291094 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576419213974 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1168901217 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.727272727 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202031274007 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078132783015 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092608038261 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148809283893 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121423175853 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.