education is more important or working friendly with other is more important in hiring new staff explain your opinion with examples
People nowadays are becoming more concern about their work and outcomes in their offices due to which demand of skilled workers has increased rapidly. This essay will discuss the both aspects of candidates that either they should be more qualified or they should be humble and cooperative.
Firstly, there are several arguments in favor of my stance, that people are encouraging more skilled and cooperative workers in their offices, rather than arrogant and ill-mannered people. Moreover, working in friendly environment is more productive as research has shown in many countries like Pakistan, America and Austria. Furthermore, candidate's ability to work with others surely help to grow the company's performance. Hence, more people are in favor to recruit new staff having friendly nature and loving personality with others.
On the other hand, many people argue that academic qualification is more important than personality or ability to work collectively with other workers. People having good knowledge have more strong communication skills that is why education plays a crucial rule in selecting a new staff in any company. In many developed countries education is considered as key of securing a good position in any office or work place.
To conclude, from my opinion, people have their own perspective in selecting or hiring new staff, but the thing that have utmost importance is education and we can never ignore instincts of good behavior and positive attitude of candidates towards working environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Rafia Jawad | 80 | view |
- An increasing temperature is an issue what are the causes of global warming and how to reduce its effects 88
- Many people prefer to work in multinational companies Give advantages and disadvantages 11
- You are given climate as field of study which particular area you will study according to your interest and why 85
- Wealthy nations are required to share their wealth with poorer countries what is your opinion 77
- Nowadays the problem of animal extinction reaches great attention That is why animal conservations have been created in order to save endangered animals Nevertheless animal conservations are not only the places for animals but also hunters Many hunters go 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4135021097 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81967688234 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590717299578 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1111700133 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.3 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356077944824 0.242375264174 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13575289041 0.0925447433944 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079757532471 0.071462118173 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201590144045 0.151781067708 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786087955096 0.0609392437508 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.