Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Whether voluntary work should be a compulsory part of high schools’ curriculum remains a controversial question. While a number of people highly praised the merits of unpaid community service, others claim that mandatory voluntary work can have some downsides. From my point of view, the latter holds true for a variety of reasons.
First and foremost, balancing time between academic schoolwork and voluntary activities is a strenuous part to most students. It is an irrefutable fact when doing volunteer work, a student must dedicate a great deal of his time to charities and voluntary organisations, helping deprived people in the community and protecting the environment. This will bring invaluable experience and knowledge to those who can manipulate their time well. However, for students who lack time management skills, along with innumerable school assignments, compulsory unpaid community service can place a huge burden on them, depriving their energy and contributing to exhaustion and tiredness. As a consequence, those students are likely to develop health problems and worsen their academic performance.
Secondly, obligatory community services are not suitable for everyone. For instance, working for a charity in far-flung regions such as a mountainous area requires students a certain level of fitness and good physical health, so these work do not fit weak girls or unhealthy students. Other problems are related to impoverished students who can’t manage their time to join voluntary services when they are struggling every day to afford their schools’ tuition fees. Therefore, forcing students to take part in voluntary work can sometimes be counter-productive. More seriously, there are nightmare students in every class, so mandatory volunteer work would be a recipe for disaster.
In conclusion, unpaid community services shouldn’t be a compulsory part of high schools’ programmes. Not only is community services not suitable for everyone but it is also a contributory factor of worsening health and declining academic performances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-01 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-01 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 84 | view |
- With the pressure on today s young people to succeed academically some people believe that non academic subjects at school e g physical education and cookery should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects 89
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Traffic congestion is becoming a huge problem for major cities What are the main causes of traffic congestion and suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce traffic jams in big cities 78
- With the considerable benefits computers and the Internet brings about they can completely replace the traditional roles of teachers Do you agree or disagree 78
- Wearing uniforms 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether voluntary work should be a compulsory p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66559485531 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14505287972 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59807073955 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2209158667 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.466666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229173838575 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906988817177 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102831578318 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176516386979 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806972952082 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.