1. The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the influence of learn more than one language has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “learn more than one language will be less important in the future?”. It is a widely held view that learn one more language in essential in this days, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a myriad of arguments about speak another language as English is important because this is a world language and everyone in the world speak English to communicate. Therefore, I express several reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is that I totally disagree when someone say that learn one more language will become less important. Secondly, it can be argued that speak other language give the capacity to improve the grammar skills and give the opportunity to get more job opportunities. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that speak more than one language is excellent for brain activities, for example, I speak as first language Portuguese, but as a live in Australia it is necessary that I speak proficient English to work and study.
However, there is no doubt that some people prefer use translate apps unless learn and try another language. It should be taken into account that is not easy learn language, sometimes is necessary travel to another country to practice the language, and it is the best part because the people could improve the vocabulary and know a new culture. Moreover, it is quite clear that people should try leave another culture.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that people should learn more than one language. However, as every garden may have some seeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hope to heighten their intellect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-26 | msgnaneswaran | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-06 | mohab.elhaddad | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | foadihasan | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | Fernanda Giorge | 55 | view |
| 2019-02-17 | Mahdi_Farhani | 80 | view |
- 1.The environment we are living in is danger due to various problems. Who do you think should be responsible to solve it? Governments, organizations or each individual? 77
- In many cultures, the priority is given to marriage over employment. What's your opinion on getting married without worrying about getting a job? 77
- 1.The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- 1.The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 55
- 1.The environment we are living in is danger due to various problems. Who do you think should be responsible to solve it? Governments, organizations or each individual? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...learn more than one language has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...learn one more language in essential in this days, whereas I tend to believe that on...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 20.9802955665 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 316.0 242.827586207 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98101265823 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73209601992 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51582278481 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 503.1 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.932204237 50.4703680194 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.166666667 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8333333333 7.25397266985 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323525682672 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116072507014 0.0925447433944 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113686017057 0.071462118173 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185002729625 0.151781067708 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118105348495 0.0609392437508 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.94827586207 176% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.