The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the language has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “will learning more than one language be less important in the future” whereas it is a widely held view that being multilingual is beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, being bilingual is bound up inextricably with learning different languages, which indicates they lead to both communication and learning in the future. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between broadening horizons and being more successful as well as an exponential increase in finding international jobs. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of learning more than one languages is correlated positively with not only being crucial but also a wide range of opportunities.
Within the realm of information science, without the slightest doubt, linguistics attribute to learning languages, in that it would come down to establishing relationships, meaningful conversations, and effective communications. A salient example of such attribution is a second language, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take globalization for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint global problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to the global village, the mother tongue, and even a common language. Hence it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of learning more than one language.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes” all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above I entirely agree that the ability to learn more than one language is of the high importance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-26 | msgnaneswaran | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-06 | mohab.elhaddad | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | foadihasan | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | Fernanda Giorge | 55 | view |
| 2019-02-17 | Mahdi_Farhani | 80 | view |
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- • In many countries, children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What are your opinions on this issu 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'learn'
Suggestion: learn
...bly leads to a moot question 'will learning more than one language be less importan...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 579, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one language', 'a language', or simply 'languages'?
Suggestion: one language; a language; languages
...at the likelihood of learning more than one languages is correlated positively with not only ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 607, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...her tongue, and even a common language. Hence it is reasonable to infer the pivotal r...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes' all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, likewise, second, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75694444444 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.321855238 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 139.433497537 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649305555556 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.2331755208 50.4703680194 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.727272727 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321615716353 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970866978147 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986770798175 0.071462118173 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186520813756 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765627491252 0.0609392437508 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 12.6369458128 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.94827586207 211% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.