In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinions.
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and negative effects on society due to student grouping according to the academic skills. While it is possible to claim that the student grouping base on academic skills as a negative thing, my point of view that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view while analysing different sides of the argument to a greater extent.
First and foremost, there are myriad of advantages a population can gain from groupings such as high integrity, high student availability, high subject security, high quality and subject confidentiality. For instance, most of the universities have grouped information technology related students into one group and those universities have produced efficient employees into the market. Therefore, it is believed that the subject related academic grouping as a must for an institute.
On the other hand, those who believed the other hand of the argument have a different point of view and say to grab the domain knowledge from other areas, the student should not group. For example, information technology needs hospitality or banking domain to develop digital applications. Therefore, it is considered that the grouping has a negative side. But, most of the universities have removed this old idea practically.
In conclusion, it is believed that the academic institutions are conducting a professional job for the society while grouping students. In nutshell, it is strongly considered the government's and professionals should take cognitive approaches to improve this.
- Environment problems are too great to be managed by individuals so real change can only be achieved at government level. 85
- To increase the price of fuel is the only way to reduce air pollution To what extent do you agree or disagree Use your own experience as examples 50
- Some people think that exercise is the key to health while others feel that having a balanced diet is more important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 65
- 'Qualifications benefit individuals, therefore governments should make individuals meet the full costs of their education'. Do you agree with this statement? 85
- Cultural Shock is a new worrying concern for few immigrants. What are the few possible options to eradicate this? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49011857708 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10545690387 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533596837945 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.34429689 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.75 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175410439206 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676393995663 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611822135533 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105673210103 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042542351725 0.0609392437508 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.