In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinions.
Nowadays, many educational institutes have transformed the way of teaching by grouping students based on their academic capabilities. Some people believe that it has negative effects on a student's mind as it makes them demotivated. On the other hand, some people believe that grouping students based on their capabilities helps teachers as well as students in many ways. I am inclined towards the view that grouping based on educational abilities has more positive effects. This essay will discuss both the views and lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with, grouping students based on their educational capabilities help teachers in identifying the weak and strong areas of students. It will help teachers to plan their sessions as per the group which is going to receive it. Also, students get benefitted as it increases their motivation level. Students from bright groups feel and students from weak academic groups become more vocal in raising their concerns. For instance, as per the recent study published by a renowned University, it has been revealed that students performance has increased by 40 per cent after introducing a grouping strategy. Therefore, grouping based on educational capability should be encouraged in educational institutes.
On the other hand, sometimes grouping creates a disparity between bright and weak students. Bright students become overconfident and they often indulge in insulting weak students. Also, in a weak student's group, students get demotivated due to the absence of challenging problems.
In the view of discussions outlined above, although grouping can have some negative effects, if students are grouped and taught on the basis of their capabilities it will not only increase motivation in them, but it will also help teachers to be more focussed and plan their sessions accordingly.
- In some countries, birth rate is slowing and the problem of aging population becomes more acute, what’s your view? 70
- A healthy body is more reliant on a healthy diet than exercise. Do you agree? Share your personal experience to support the statement. 67
- In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinions. 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
... motivation level. Students from bright groups feel and students from weak academic gr...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...d University, it has been revealed that students performance has increased by 40 per cen...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43902439024 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93737935948 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512195121951 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2901035951 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.066666667 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181558276899 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734390696263 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050631984366 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11881126538 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038408258497 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.