Age discrimination
In this day and age, age discrimination in working environment has become controversial topic among public all around the world, it is a widely held view that company should respect age discrimination for quality of job, while I tend to believe that age discrimination has lot of negative effects.
From development point of view, age discrimination are indeed inbound to innovation, which means it might lead to both score low on innovation measure and reduce productivity, For instance a group of reputable developer working at prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to understand the relationship between economy and productivity at the national level, Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the contention that age discrimination is negatively correlated with not only innovation but also economy.
From psychological terms, discrimination in working environment are undoubtedly attributable to unfairness perception, in that it would lead to inequality in workplaces, a well know example of such attribution is a research done by Tehran university which has shown that inequality prevent people from performing well in their jobs, Thus perception of fairness could play a significant role in favorable future of employees and employer.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both side, my personal sentiment is that the benefit of prevent age discrimination in workplace far outweigh its drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-24 | Patrick_17 | 55 | view |
| 2020-09-02 | abhinavcreed13 | 94 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Ammu helen | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | arami | 88 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | njerime | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h not only innovation but also economy. From psychological terms, discrimination...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 5.75862068966 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 218.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72935779817 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43521632792 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651376146789 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 12.6551724138 32% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 54.0 20.5024630542 263% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 132.377065612 50.4703680194 262% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 312.25 104.977214359 297% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 54.5 20.9669160288 260% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 15.25 7.25397266985 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456939674194 0.242375264174 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.276814871021 0.0925447433944 299% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180281243073 0.071462118173 252% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276814871021 0.151781067708 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.180281243073 0.0609392437508 296% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 32.8 12.6369458128 260% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -0.25 53.1260098522 -0% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 19.3 6.54236453202 295% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 26.7 10.9458128079 244% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 16.84 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.17 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 34.0 9.94827586207 342% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 23.6 10.3980295567 227% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 27.0 10.5123152709 257% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.