age discrimination
According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered socio-economic impacts. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both aging employees and the social progression apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of economic science, discrimination against older workers might increase the consequences of higher unemploment rates. Moreover, fundamental aspects of pensioners would relate to this reality that the demerits of inflation rates pertain to ageing-related health problems. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of age discrimination in workplaces is correlated negatively with the company's profit. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of economic situations.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of age discriminations far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of economic impacts prove the significance of #, but also pinpoint its crucial implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-24 | Patrick_17 | 55 | view |
| 2020-09-02 | abhinavcreed13 | 94 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Ammu helen | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | arami | 88 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | njerime | 80 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 31.9359605911 66% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 1207.87684729 79% => OK
No of words: 157.0 242.827586207 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.05732484076 5.00649968141 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.92707691288 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.53181003201 2.71678728327 130% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 139.433497537 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.770700636943 0.580463131201 133% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 379.143842365 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6551724138 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.766857422 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.875 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301264850305 0.242375264174 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105448092615 0.0925447433944 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992623008405 0.071462118173 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176067527983 0.151781067708 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766691136761 0.0609392437508 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.87 11.5310837438 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.72 8.32886699507 141% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.