Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person’s age. In the workplace, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against older workers be made illegal?
Older workers are the key assets of an organization, with their age we earn their experience and knacks to deal in dire situations. Discrimination itself is profane on its own and neglecting someone on there age is insane to the society and its organizations. Let's delve into the essay below to debate on this topic.
Often we have come across policies of organization where we need to stay after hours to achieve our targets and meet customer expectaions, just to keep the sales growth ascending, just to keep the KPI above 99%, even just to cherish customer. Unfortunately we are in such a country that supports various other parts of globe across diffrent time zones. Organization, hence, need young and vibrant talents to work to the summit of their capacity and achive targets. Here kicks in the discremination rule to filter out the old and aged resources.
The process of filtering old resorces are well said to be age discrimination, but we are ignoring the moot question of the benifits they serve to the organization by their experiences and lessons learned. Companies should rather promote old workers to a diffrent domain where they can take the heat and share their profound knowledge, like traning, educating new resources, consultant, customer relationship managers. This will in return not only improvise customer relationship but will also bondage the customer loyalty. Finally the organization will be getting positive growth in all prospects.
Knowing organizations have stict rules and policies those are deemed to be followed, albiet these are for the benifit of the organization but ageing should not be the factor to stop talents and ideas. I concede that rather discarding someone because of there age we should reap knowledge and take benifits of their experience.
- The claim that animals have rights has been subjected as a matter of debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? 77
- Cheating and lying are sometimes acceptable. Choose whether you agree or disagree with this statement and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading. 77
- The claim that animals have rights has been subjected as a matter of debate since the 1970’s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? 80
- Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person s age In the workplace these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed Should discrimination against older wor 64
- Fast food has become a part of our society. What is the impact of fast food on human life? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...e to the society and its organizations. Lets delve into the essay below to debate on...
^^^^
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...will also bondage the customer loyalty. Finally the organization will be getting positi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17465753425 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91124696399 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595890410959 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.722828649 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.230769231 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.25397266985 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150628688207 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518762647169 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469291815664 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0935320072647 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422795911119 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.