Are the cars damaging the environment? Should the number of cars bought be to one per family? Discuss the problem and provide a solution.
The effect of damaging the environment and the number of cars bought to one per family, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. It can be agreed strongly upon the fact that this matter has some convincing arguments despite contentions about it. This essay will elaborate how increasing air pollution and how improving the public transport to reduce carbon-dioxide and thus will lead to a reasoned conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why damaging the environment and the number of cars bought to one per family have some negative aspects, but the most alarming one lies in the fact that increasing air pollution, and this can be a contributing factor to the high amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere that are making people develop numerous diseases. For instance, research in this area invariably shows that roughly 58% of pollution is a small city is from cars. For this reason, the adverse impacts of TOPIC should not be ignored.
Nevertheless, some people believe that the number of cars bought to one per family can be addressed with same positive facets as well. However, the most predominant one stems from the fact that improving the public transport to reduce carbon-dioxide, which is not only beneficial but also necessary. As an illustration, findings of some studies reveal that approximately 70% of a city in China has been reduced due a local law that only one car per family is allowed. Therefore, the importance of TOPIC is undeniable.
After analysing the above discussion, it can be concluded that the impact of damaging the environment and the number of cars bought to one per family is significant, although the given negative effect should not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-22 | daniellima126 | 77 | view |
- The importance of radical sports for health, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of dangers sports has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on accepting this sort of sports in 55
- Write your opinion about Health is wealth in today’s Society. How does it impact one’s lifestyle? 77
- Moving from rural areas to big cities will provide more opportunities. Your opinion. 77
- Travelling to study is over-rated. We have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really necessary for tertiary studies? 77
- Recycling our waste is a big issue today A lot of people feel that others are not recycling enough and that the government should make it a legal requirement In your opinion should laws be needed to ensure that people recycle their waste 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06643356643 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89128705058 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520979020979 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.4705171615 50.4703680194 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.727272727 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387950274498 0.242375264174 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147765799443 0.0925447433944 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147766272557 0.071462118173 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27330364706 0.151781067708 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0896160279681 0.0609392437508 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06643356643 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89128705058 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520979020979 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.4705171615 50.4703680194 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.727272727 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387950274498 0.242375264174 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147765799443 0.0925447433944 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147766272557 0.071462118173 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27330364706 0.151781067708 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0896160279681 0.0609392437508 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.