These days, there is an ongoing debate between people that belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices. It is possible to claim that it has far reaching impact on society. My vies is that I strongly agree to that statement. In this essay, I will discuss on both sides of the argument which will led to a logical conclusion.
Firstly, many organization has certain policies for an employee to follow in their organization. Belching, it is biological process. It is nothing but expelling an air from stomach through mouth. It makes other people to be uncomfortable and unpleasant environment too. For example, while talking in an important meeting. If the presenter belch it will be an uncomfortable situation for all.
Secondly, many offices have certain policies for others to follow in order to maintain the secret documents etc. But not abiding to those policies accessing documents and distributing to other parties, bullying colleague, harassment all this led to punishable behavior.
In conclusion, if the employee is following belching and unauthorized behavior against company policies they need to be treated their behavior. Organization can even terminate the employee for their unauthorized behavior in office premises.
- In the 18th century due to industrialization, a lot of people migrate to developed countries. This affected lifestyle and increased problem in developed countries. What is your opinion about this? 87
- Belching and unauthorised behaviour is unacceptable in modern offices How far you support this view Give your response with justification 72
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? 55
- Parents should be held responsible for their children's acts. what is your opinion? support it with personal examples. 55
- Belching and unauthorised behaviour is unacceptable in modern offices How far you support this view Give your response with justification 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun organization seems to be countable; consider using: 'many organizations'.
Suggestion: many organizations
...ed to a logical conclusion. Firstly, many organization has certain policies for an employee to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 1207.87684729 88% => OK
No of words: 196.0 242.827586207 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44897959184 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.92707691288 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07933418811 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 139.433497537 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 379.143842365 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1744921493 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.2857142857 104.977214359 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0 20.9669160288 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0822116274176 0.242375264174 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0269988837036 0.0925447433944 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305452351402 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0527284190244 0.151781067708 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356243679878 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.1260098522 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.