building more roads to allow more vehicle owner to improve the networks of public transport? agree or disagree?
Recently, the role of teachers regarding student's behavior has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "do teachers judge students for right and wrong behaviors?". Whereas it is a widely held view that teachers must be accountable to modify student's behavior, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the education standpoint, teaching staffs are bound up inextricably with course syllabus, which indicates they lead to both oral examination and written assessment. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between overall grade and pupil performance as well as an exponential increase in mental ability. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of behavioral problem is correlated positively with not only personal traits but also parent.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, antisocial behaviors attribute to wrong doing, in that it would come down to punishment, depression, and anxiety. A salient example of such attribution is good judgement, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take positive role for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to practical skill, team tasks, and even inherent capacity. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of mass media, television, community, and classmates.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that teachers must not be only responsible for students' wrong behavior. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-18 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
| 2018-04-26 | dhavalpatel095 | 85 | view |
- In some countries, the number of shootings increases because many people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer 85
- Mass media 11
- Discuss both sides of Space travel vs. Current crucial problems faced by the human? 88
- With the increase of digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. University should only produce digital media rather than constantly updating textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and gi 11
- Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. What is your opinion? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the education standpoint, teaching ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y personal traits but also parent. Within the realm of psychology, without ...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vision, community, and classmates. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, regarding, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80689655172 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1232243469 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 139.433497537 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.696551724138 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7872296977 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.538461538 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0145161839148 0.242375264174 6% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00515776504455 0.0925447433944 6% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0178670222213 0.071462118173 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0098689027109 0.151781067708 7% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170934409102 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.