There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. What forms do they take? Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phones?
Recently, associated problems with the use of mobile phone has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the advantages and disadvantages of mobile phone?". Whereas it is a widely held view that mobile phone has a lot social, medical, and technical problems, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the technology standpoint, smart phones are bound up inextricably with telecommunication, which indicates they lead to both applicability and reliability. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between Internet access and digital gadget as well as an exponential increase in general knowledge. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of connection is correlated positively with not only network infrastructure but also modern equipment.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, advanced technology attribute to new issues, in that it would come down to social, medical, and psychological. A salient example of such attribution is children, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take antisocial behavior for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint incorrect education problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to broadband connection, unlimited information, and even easy access. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of mobile phone in urgent cases.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the advantages of mobile phone outweigh its disadvantages. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-11 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2018-08-08 | Priyanka1803 | 70 | view |
- There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. What forms do they take? Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phones? 85
- With the amount of motivation and practice, people can learn anything that the experts teach in the classroom. Agree or not? 85
- What is your opinion on deducting marks on student's work if it is late? 85
- "More information available online so library books are useless." Agree or disagree with statement? 80
- Culture shock is a new worrying concern for few immigrants. What are the possible options to eradicate this issue? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the technology standpoint, smart ph...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ructure but also modern equipment. Within the realm of society, without the...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of mobile phone in urgent cases. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86458333333 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30480960012 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684027777778 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8954342373 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.923076923 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230075718167 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063505455667 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738851674014 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130079766338 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0952380005531 0.0609392437508 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.09 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 55.0591133005 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.