Buildings design have positive effect and negative effect on people's life?
The effect of certain design on people's life and work which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of design patterns has sparked the controversy over the potential impact on people's over the years. It can be said that it depends on certain types of people, some they don't really matter, but few are really concerned about it. This essay will elaborate how the architecture's work effect on individuals negatively and how it puts a stress positively and thus lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why it has positive effects on individual due to elixir designs, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that some people are motivated even by looking at the design according to their mind development and they develop certain feelings to different task and activities. For example, written something on wall really encourage some people to do better in future growth due to motivation on the walls and designs. So, it has positive outcomes of the building designs.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of building design, but the most alarming one is rooted in the fact that it has some negative aspect as well, which can demotivate the people's attention because of negative things on the design and they are depressed by looking certain design, which reduces their ability to do something. So, it has some disadvantages as well.
From what has been discussed it can be said that the impact of building design is prominent, although the way it discourage people's ability and enthusiasm should be well handled.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-11 | SATHISH KUMAR B | 55 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Vindictassas | view | |
| 2023-04-21 | padim30987 | 75 | view |
| 2021-11-22 | Neel 12121212 | 77 | view |
| 2021-03-07 | honorrr | 88 | view |
- Does video conferencing with doctor help patients to cure any disease discuss the pros and cons?The importance of video conferencing which was always debatable has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of video conferencing has sparked 77
- The effect of xenophobia, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of xenophobia has sparked the controversy over the years. It can be said that government can erdicate the incidence of xenophobia by awarnes 88
- Should heritage buildings be preserved? Discuss your views. 77
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Do you agree or disagree 77
- unauthorized behavior is not acceptable in the workplace give your opinion 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s on certain types of people, some they dont really matter, but few are really conce...
^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...spect as well, which can demotivate the peoples attention because of negative things on...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'discourages'?
Suggestion: discourages
...esign is prominent, although the way it discourage peoples ability and enthusiasm should b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, nevertheless, really, so, thus, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12867647059 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76092660575 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540441176471 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.589623032 50.4703680194 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 139.5 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288069446169 0.242375264174 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107398784956 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754280586667 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16263840512 0.151781067708 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051838558826 0.0609392437508 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.