cashless society
Although topics, in all likelihood, will never yield to a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on cashless society can lead to though-provoking discussions. My view is that irrespective of the numerous arguments that exit on either sides, cashless society has several privileges on both individuals and nations.
There are a number of reasons in favor of my stance. To commence with, this method of payment, which is one of the technological breakthrough, has various positive effect on communities prosperity. For example, it is crucial to consider that when individuals deal virtually with each other in their payment transactions, they save a sizable effort and time. Therefore, the aforementioned discussion shows that the governments should encourage their nations to deal by the electronic methods through social media’s awareness campaigns.
Another pivotal aspect of the argument is that authorities which treat by this method could achieve more safety level. For instance, as soon as governments enhance the number of electronic deals, number of crimes might be decreased. Consequently, it is exemplified that this cashless countries will get enormous security advantages.
Having manifested the above notions, it could be concluded that there is equally potential evidence to support the arguments which were illustrated in the above lines, and hence my opinion is cashless society is more safe and people can get higher financial capacities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-31 | Behnaz fallah | 88 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 88 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 85 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | MojtabaKarami | 80 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | MojtabaKarami | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'communities'' or 'community's'?
Suggestion: communities'; community's
...through, has various positive effect on communities prosperity. For example, it is crucial ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 221.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67873303167 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18780769382 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638009049774 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6501601096 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233412079993 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827232676434 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106717065808 0.071462118173 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148888963541 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132963239817 0.0609392437508 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.