Certain kinds of music promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently the phenomenon of promoting learning by music for children and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that music can be waste of time, I amongst other group tend to believe that school students can encourage to learn their courses more efficiently through music. This essay will examine both sides of this issue by providing some academic evidence before concluding.
On the one hand, from an educational standpoint, I profoundly inclined to believe that learning courses with some kind of music are essential for children when music is regarded as a part of the human soul. Also, it could lead to improving their outlook on the life. Moreover, school learners who tend to participate in music classes, learn how to work as a team, which is a very useful skill. Not to mention that music can encourage them to be more creative, sociable and positive in society. According to an academic research conducted by Tehran University, teenage students who learn to play a musical instrument can think out of the box more than their counterparts.
On the other hands, some opponents regarded learning music as a waste of time. They support their idea through some valid logic that learning theoretical courses just need to concentration and practice. Furthermore, they think, the educational curriculum should be more precise to some courses such as mathematics and physics. For instance, some students are not so flexible while it comes to learn music and they tend to refuse their tutors instructions.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, although some opponents think that learning music is a time wasting for young learners, I tend to believe that some type of music, such as piano, could be beneficial for children in many cases.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-26 | ca hetal | 80 | view |
| 2018-08-13 | sara malla | 80 | view |
| 2018-08-13 | sara malla | 69 | view |
- In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. Discuss both views. 85
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- You have recently found a job vacancy in the local newspaper Write a letter to the company and say what position you are applying to and where it was advertised In your letter include some information about your skills education and experience Explain why 83
- Social media and the Internet have bad effects on people as they make communications poor. Do you agree or disagree? Give examples. 80
- The ability to learn more than one languages will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'learning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: learning
...ieve that school students can encourage to learn their courses more efficiently through ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, while, for instance, kind of, such as, in many cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11224489796 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76519734371 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547619047619 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8781845313 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.615384615 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.25397266985 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209427855154 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836981899132 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573371001054 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139017553823 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393893776115 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.