Parents should be held legally responsible for children's activities. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of parents being responsible for their offspring’s actions and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the parent-children relationship is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I profoundly inclined to believe that many fundamental factors are involved, and this essay will examine both sides by providing academic evidence before the conclusion.
From a social standpoint, children’s positive attitude can provide the society with some noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that spending enough time with parents and having a reliable role model can extremely bound up. According to my own experience when I was a college student, I participated in an academic survey which resulted in the fact that parenting and upbringing should be considered as essential parts of children’s social development. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both daily activity and spending quality times by family apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, parent’s disengagement in the juvenile’s education curriculum might increase the consequences of anti-social behavior. Moreover, other factors such as youngster’s friend circle, teachers and economic background may also have some rigorous and detrimental impacts. As a tangible example, some scientific experiments undertaken by a prestigious institute, which asserted that parents’ supervision should not be underestimated. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of public awareness and educated family members.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that although some opponents tend to argue that parents should be mainly responsible for their offsprings’ behavior in the society, I strongly tend to think that with regards to the advancements of social media and Internet nowadays, the roles of parents are becoming shallower than ever before.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | emchawia | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | maninder1989 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | daniellima126 | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-04 | payamesp2 | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | Kushi | 88 | view |
- You are applying for a job and need a letter of reference from someone who knew you when you were at school. Write a letter to one of your old teachers asking for a reference. in your letter•Say what job you have applied for.•explain why you want this 34
- Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- The ability to learn more than one languages will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- Some believe that it is good for a country’s culture to import films and TV programs, while others think it is better for a country to have their own films and TV programs. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 70
- Nowadays, more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same jobs. What problems this causes? What are the solutions? 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, hence, if, may, moreover, so, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1207.87684729 145% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.96587030717 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48964050961 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648464163823 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 379.143842365 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.0744018227 50.4703680194 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.909090909 104.977214359 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183937642048 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683019953546 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588773594392 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115390783795 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306566390873 0.0609392437508 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 12.6369458128 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 53.1260098522 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.9458128079 155% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.64 11.5310837438 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.23 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 55.0591133005 212% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.5123152709 190% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.