It is foolish idea to get married before finishing the study and settling down. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of getting married before graduation and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of early marriage is highly rewarding, a substantial number of individuals regards such issue thoroughly both constructive and positive. I profoundly inclined to believe that providing some basic situation before getting married is a fundamental, and this essay will examined both sides before concluding by providing some academic evidence.
From an academic standpoint, serenity that comes along side with happy marriage could bring some noticeable merits for society. Firstly, young couples could spend much more time with each other, which brings them wide variety of recognition about their needs. Secondly, according to an academic research conducted by a prestigious university, early marriage could benefits young students, such as college students, with some physical and psychological positive effects, that could lead them to improve their outlooks about life.
On the other hand, opponents inclined to believe that building a family is a highly responsible action, which should be prepared for it. They use a valid logic to support their idea that becoming a wife or husband before finishing their study could lead to the lack of concentration on their educational purpose. Moreover, without any economic background, this kind of marriage could bring some detrimental and disastrous impacts for both the family and the society. As a tangible example, a scientific research conducted by Tehran University in 2015, most of the problems in young couple’s life, which finally lead to the divorce, came from the lack of proper accommodation and loads of financial pressure.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, while there are several compelling arguments on both side, I highly tend to believe that benefits of graduating before marriage is far outweigh its demerits.
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 80
- You are applying for a job and need a letter of reference from someone who knew you when you were at school. Write a letter to one of your old teachers asking for a reference. in your letter•Say what job you have applied for.•explain why you want this 34
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which position you most ag 88
- it's difficult to maintain the balance between work and other aspects of life such as family and leisure time, what is your opinion to keep it balanced. 77
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 432, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'examine'
Suggestion: examine
...d is a fundamental, and this essay will examined both sides before concluding by providi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: ALONG_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'alongside'?
Suggestion: alongside
...cademic standpoint, serenity that comes along side with happy marriage could bring some no...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
...igious university, early marriage could benefits young students, such as college student...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58053691275 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89767578092 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60067114094 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.8983426728 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.181818182 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.25397266985 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.092266434986 0.242375264174 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369508575947 0.0925447433944 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512682573694 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0599428326548 0.151781067708 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438207702918 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.