“More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with the statement?
Recently, the phenomenon of online documents and its corresponding impacts sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that using online books are highly rewarding, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I profoundly inclined to believe that with regards to peace of information technology, online information should be replaced in some certain cases. This essay will examine both views on this issue by providing some academic evidence before concluding.
From a technological standpoint, using electronic books can provide society with some noticeable benefits which are rooted in the fact that electronic publication and saving the environment, are essentially related. According to an academic survey conducted by Tehran University, digital publications can lead to lessening the use of the paper sheets which consequently related to saving the trees and stopped deforestation. Thus, beneficial ramification both environmentally friendly and economically can be seen.
On the other side, some opponents argued that using new advancement in publishing industry may lead to changing the true value of the library. Moreover, they use some valid logic to support their idea about detrimental impacts of using electronic documentation as an economic issue towards book publishing industry. According to an academic research, publication industry provides thousands of job opportunities for people which could be diminished by propagation of electronic books.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that although some opponents stand against using digital publication due to some negative effects of it on the public library, I highly tend to believe that using advanced technology should be regarded as a way of saving the environment from human damage. Not to mention that the role of governments in increasing the public awareness about this idea is influential and should be considered as an important support for the publishing industry.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-11 | Dinuka Dissanayaje | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-11 | bVP6525 | 72 | view |
| 2019-01-19 | Rohit mahajan | 55 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | mohseny | 88 | view |
| 2018-08-29 | Anonymous | 77 | view |
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? (Agree/Disagree) 88
- Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- “More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with the statement? 85
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make a better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree? 88
- Some people think that young people can learn useful skills by playing electronic and computer games. others argue that people who play electronic and computer games are wasting their time. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: PEACE_PIECE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'piece'?
Suggestion: piece
...nclined to believe that with regards to peace of information technology, online infor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, may, moreover, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74333333333 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2038501144 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573333333333 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 379.143842365 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.3636801755 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.583333333 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 7.25397266985 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0602037577619 0.242375264174 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0269239676804 0.0925447433944 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403173353037 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0400899636193 0.151781067708 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441992810921 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.