Company top level authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions.
Decisions are very important part of any company's future growth. I agree with the statement to some extent that companies top level authorities should involve some senior employees in taking important decisions. Because involvement of senior employees will have positive effect on company's overall growth.
If any person is in the company from long duration then that person should be involved in decision making process. Companies can make that person feel important. This will motivate the employees and that person will definitely perform better. productivity of the employee will also be improved with participation and involvement in important decisions with top authorities.
Not every employee should be part of this process because if the person has joined some time back only, then that person will not have much idea about the working culture and policies of the organisation.But, by good experience with the company, if someone has great knowledge of the factors which impact company's overall growth then in decision making process person can share ideas. Company can make best use of those ideas to form new strategies which will help in proceeding with future projects and in getting ready to compete in market for more business.
Summing up all this I can say that, If company is involving trust worthy employees in decision making, that organisation will definitely grow better, Which is good for both employees and employers overall growth.
- Company top level authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. 77
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? (Agree/Disagree) 72
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what do you agree or disagree? 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...mployees in taking important decisions. Because involvement of senior employees will ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... effect on companys overall growth. If any person is in the company from long ...
^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Productivity
... person will definitely perform better. productivity of the employee will also be improved w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'parted'?
Suggestion: parted
...rities. Not every employee should be part of this process because if the person h...
^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...ulture and policies of the organisation.But, by good experience with the company, i...
^^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'make the best'.
Suggestion: make the best
...ess person can share ideas. Company can make best use of those ideas to form new strategi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... up all this I can say that, If company is involving trust worthy employees in decision maki...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1239.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 231.0 242.827586207 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36363636364 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68874734185 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 379.8 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 93.2654276782 50.4703680194 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.9 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.25397266985 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249074679219 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110422142828 0.0925447433944 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103873078301 0.071462118173 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163508351251 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106667957598 0.0609392437508 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.