creativity is born with or can be taught or improved. What is your view point?
It is an irrefutable fact that talent is born from childhood. Some people believe that creativity can never be taught while others believe that it can be learned with the help of lessons, daily practice and make it perfect in our life. I firmly believe that it can be learned at any phase of life. I will elaborate on my views in the forthcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, there are multifarious things to make our talent at a high level. Since it is clear that any person who born have any kind of creativity and talent which is God gifted. But if we can not practice or use precious talent, it may have vanished. In our daily routine, anyone can explore and earn name and fame in the future. For instance, there is one show on TV named as ‘India’s Got Talent’ in which one child has a passion for drawing pictures with the help of mud. And when he starts coaching to draw something more interesting, it makes perfect him to draw anything with the help of mud.
On the other hand, we can not believe that creativity is only taught and improve as no one can dance. The only those can who are god gifted in that that art, can make it good with daily practice. On the contrary, the person who does not know ‘ABC’ about that field if they start learning or wants to improve. They may not be so much better as compared to God gifted person. So, it is the utmost necessity that talent is born from birth and can only be made perfect, God gifted ideas.
To conclude, it is immensely clear that the above-mentioned information is like two sides of a win but with the help of coaching or learning any art, talent and whatnot hold more water than make as creativity like when it is in the time born.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-02 | Onepunchman | 77 | view |
| 2020-05-11 | Kanika Aggarwal | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | jashan randhawa | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | gupta-vikas | 55 | view |
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace. So it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 80
- Some employers offer their employees subsidized membership of gyms and sports clubs believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work Other employers see no benefit in doing so Consider the arguments from both aspects of 63
- Medical technology can increase life expectancy. How much do you agree? 72
- Some people believe laws can change human behavior. Do you agree with this statement? 85
- Teenagers should receive lessons on principles of personal finance, such as investing and debt. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
...d improve as no one can dance. The only those can who are god gifted in that that art, ca...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...as no one can dance. The only those can who are god gifted in that that art, can make i...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, while, for instance, kind of, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 5.94088669951 303% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 20.9802955665 167% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 318.0 242.827586207 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42767295597 5.00649968141 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55729797873 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493710691824 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 447.3 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1480464297 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 6.9802955665 201% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257114760317 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871761341155 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622310441621 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166487341091 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729310973555 0.0609392437508 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 12.6369458128 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.1260098522 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.9458128079 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 11.5310837438 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.32886699507 84% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 55.0591133005 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.