Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. And whether you support them or not.
There are a great number of people who interpret the impact of extreme sports as thoroughly constructive, while others hold an opponent’s view. I am inclined to believe that these sports are beneficial and they could develop positive characteristics in people.
There are several reasons why extreme sports are advantageous. First of all, it is argued that these sports play a pivotal role in creating adroit people. This may be attributed to the fact that playing such games create a feeling of accomplishment and competence, which consequently open avenues to new achievement. For example, climbing mountain instead of indoor games, increases people determination and etiquettes towards many daunting tasks, therefore, their enthusiasm and self-confidence will be amplified, which provoke them to do uphill struggle in a positive way and catalyze the surge of learning something new
In addition, it is believed that these odd games could efficiently ease anguish and fight with anxiety and depression. This is to say that the extreme sports are considered to be a lasting and natural way to simulate a person’s brain with countless variables, so that they will be forced to come out from their comfort one, which consequently creates a feeling of relaxation and satisfaction. Take the water rafting for instance, it would help the athletes to instill a strong feeling of self-esteem. As these examples illustrate, the benefits of extreme sports are obvious, and our behavior could be enormously and constructively shaped.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that extreme sports are constructive and exhilarating. It is recommended that people take cognizance of the risks of these games, and they should be tried under proper guidance and supervision of a professional trainer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-30 | Mpaul | 70 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | Simranjot7087 | 11 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | mizomz123 | 55 | view |
| 2019-04-27 | rayudurp | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-21 | jaideep singh | 88 | view |
- The environment we are living is in danger due to various problems…so who do u think should be responsible for solving it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual? 80
- Some people think that technology improves the quality of life whereas others feel that creates a new problem that threatens the quality of life. Discuss both views and suggest your opinion. 77
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not. 11
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. And whether you support them or not. 11
- In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hich provoke them to do uphill struggle in a positive way and catalyze the surge of learning some...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47517730496 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2062307305 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58865248227 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.6481350328 50.4703680194 195% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.363636364 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4545454545 7.25397266985 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0454285021459 0.242375264174 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0208362221533 0.0925447433944 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0215959365652 0.071462118173 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0292160881343 0.151781067708 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00235369630785 0.0609392437508 4% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.