Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that?
Recently, the phenomenon of extreme sports has sparked an ongoing controversy, which
inevitably leads to a moot question “are there reasons to support these activities?”. Whereas
it is a widely held view that sports like bungee jumping seem more deleterious rather than
constructive, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the sports medicine standpoint, adventurous sports are bound up inextricably with the
youth interest, which indicates they might lead to both mental and physical health. As a wellknown example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates
the relationship between risky sports and excitement as well as an exponential increase in
the adrenalin rush. Their academic criticism was impressive. Researchers, nevertheless, paid
heed to vigorous exercise, unusual experience, and body reaction alike. Consequently, my
empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of being
life-threatening is positively correlated with not only serious injuries but also reducing
depression in risk-taking sports.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, exciting sports attribute to social
inequalities, in that it would come down to lucrative sports, the expensive equipment, and
fame and fortune for athletes. A salient example of such attribution is spectator sports, which
is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take these stressful situations for granted. Had
there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint
recreational sports’ problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to the
competition, rivalry, and even challenges. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of
modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of socioeconomic
dimensions of extreme sports.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what
elaborated above, I firmly believe that there are some reasons to support dangerous
activities. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the
further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | amk79msce | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | amk79msce | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | kuldeep sharma | 100 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | nicah | 72 | view |
- Panda population 22
- Cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and lesspeople use cash. How realistic do you think it is and do you think it is beneficial or problematic? 88
- Cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and lesspeople use cash. How realistic do you think it is and do you think it is beneficial or problematic? 88
- The advanced medical technology will expand human’s life. Do you think it is a blessing or a curse? 85
- Happiness index is becoming a new national success rather than only economic growth. What do you think about this idea? What can be used to measure happiness index? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...f that throughout this essay. From the sports medicine standpoint, adventurous sports...
^^^^^^
Line 22, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1207.87684729 160% => OK
No of words: 322.0 242.827586207 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98757763975 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30518249394 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 139.433497537 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686335403727 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 379.143842365 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8379344952 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.533333333 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 24.0 4.12807881773 581% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154421761823 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396317147611 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055248884393 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0351530729753 0.151781067708 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508975564013 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.46 11.5310837438 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.81 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 55.0591133005 227% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.