Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged product or it is the responsibility of producers?

Essay topics:

Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged product or it is the responsibility of producers?

Surely there has been no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on typically day reveals consumers should avoid over packaged product or it is the responsibility of producers has been one of the prominent topics in the contemporary discussion. People have always been intrigued to analyze regarding this I would say plastic polithins bad for health, some people always say stop made of plastic things.
To begin, big way of pollution is globalization if day by day increase fast, if not good for health. But all important and usefully things are come in packaged like milk, grocery, medicine and so on. Over packing is waste of resources and leads to environment damage. Some people argue that customers should refuse to buy over packaged items. Over packing not only affects the environment but also increase the cost of product, trees are cut down to produce paper and cardboard. Thus it is evident that if they avoid this practice, it will benefit the consumer as well as the environment
Furthermore consumers can also discourage manufactures from over packing their goods by simply refusing to buy those most of the time producers resort to over packing to grab the attention of buyers
In conclusion, both the buyers and the producer have the responsibility to avoid over packing. However, in my opinion the producer has a greater responsibility because there are the ones who actually package the goods

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-10 heemagupta 77 view
2019-11-10 heemagupta 77 view
2019-10-18 maniram vicky 72 view
2019-10-05 raavi sandhu 80 view
2019-09-04 Ekta shah 77 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 479, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ut down to produce paper and cardboard. Thus it is evident that if they avoid this p...
^^^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... packing to grab the attention of buyers In conclusion, both the buyers and the p...
^^^
Line 4, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...greater responsibility because there are the ones who actually package the goods ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, thus, well, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04526748971 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80868945829 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 94.1585896241 50.4703680194 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.6 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4 7.25397266985 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32909732514 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120202711766 0.0925447433944 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121042783733 0.071462118173 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199057109624 0.151781067708 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515697233645 0.0609392437508 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.