Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers?
Nowadays, it is not difficult to find a product that is over packaged in markets. Many think that it is the responsibility of producers to control the over package issue, while some think it is the responsibility of consumer to avoid it. This essay will discuss why it is up to producers to not over package the product at the first place.
First of all, producers should not over package products because it is not cost effective for both parties. While producers required higher cost to pack the product which increase the package fee, the sales price will be higher and eventually absorbed by consumer. For example, the branded liquor - Chivas have different type of packaging and the market researchers found that the most popular type is actually the normal type , as it is the cheapest type. Hence, producers can reduce the sales price by reduce the over package and it will benefit both producers and consumers.
Furthermore, it is everyone's responsibility to conserve the environment and reduce the wastage. Over packaging required a lot of plastic or box to beautify their product outlook so that consumers will be attracted by them. A research shows that the over packaging had significantly increase the daily wastage by 180% as consumers tend to throw away since the packaging did not serve any purpose for them. Therefore, by minimize the packaging, the producers are able to reduce the wastage in the world.
In a nutshell, it is important to reduce the over packaging as it is not cost effective and caused a lot of wastage. In my opinion, I completely agree that it is responsibility of producers to not over packaging the products in the first place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-10 | heemagupta | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | heemagupta | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | maniram vicky | 72 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | raavi sandhu | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Ekta shah | 77 | view |
- Life - pursue happiness or meaning 55
- Many young people get married before finishing their study and establishing a good job. To what extant do you agree? Please explain. 72
- Over packaging responsible of consumer or producer 63
- Work from home or travelling to workplace 77
- robots take over all work or have their limitation 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 426, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...popular type is actually the normal type , as it is the cheapest type. Hence, prod...
^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: Research
...at consumers will be attracted by them. A research shows that the over packaging had signi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'increased'.
Suggestion: increased
...at the over packaging had significantly increase the daily wastage by 180% as consumers ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aging the products in the first place.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, furthermore, hence, if, look, so, therefore, while, for example, first of all, in my opinion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89084507042 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81473743599 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457746478873 0.580463131201 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7988309793 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.846153846 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.25397266985 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454045011582 0.242375264174 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176952748686 0.0925447433944 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114084363066 0.071462118173 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307465283207 0.151781067708 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112811091252 0.0609392437508 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 12.6369458128 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.