Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products ? Give your views or and relevant example with your own experience.
Nowadays, in the market, new products are coming and more people get product which is over packaged. New technology has made entire system very systematic and decorative becasue of more and more individuals can attract toward it. But, I believe that it is not need over packaging product. So, this is responsibility of the people as well as manufacturer that they should avoid over packaged products. I will put my point views in further paragraphs.
To begin with, people buy the products from shopping malls and supermarkets and so that the manufacturer make the product with good attractive and decorative over packaging. Moreover, many buyers try to make the products over packaging which already manufacture makes that product with enough packing. As a result, over packaging product makes the product more weighty from actual weight so people have to pay extra money which is not sensible.
On the flip side, such kinds of the over packaging products should be avoided by people. Also, this is responsibility of the manufacturer and buyer that the product never makes over packaging if not more requires it. Moreover, if the product may be very costly or fragile so it is reasonable for making over packing.
To conclusion, over packaged products make people more crappy but people should understand the reality behind the truth. Also, manufactures should take care to produce the product where product must be good quality with less over pack.
- Some people think law changes human behaviour. Do you agree or disagree? 55
- What are the benefits of living in big cities, as opposed to rural areas? What are the problems of rural areas and how can they be solved? 77
- Scientific research should be restricted to provide education and personal knowledge. Do you agree? 77
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree? 55
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
...oward it. But, I believe that it is not need over packaging product. So, this is res...
^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s a result, over packaging product makes the product more weighty from actual wei...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, well, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.75862068966 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68540979122 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542016806723 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 383.4 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0183009798 50.4703680194 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1538461538 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3076923077 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336501064699 0.242375264174 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156794334042 0.0925447433944 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750503098802 0.071462118173 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243892168786 0.151781067708 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130312106628 0.0609392437508 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.32886699507 90% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 55.0591133005 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.