Does the advent of Internet change the role of teacher? To what extent do you agree?

Essay topics:

Does the advent of Internet change the role of teacher? To what extent do you agree?

The discussion on advancement of technology evolve teacher role is a debatable one and each side has its logical arguments. I am more incline to believe that Internet does not change the role of teacher but it is tool to enhance the role of teacher.

On one hand critics point out that accessibility of Internet made teacher role important. Some young learner can acquire knowledge through online learning, and teacher only play a small part of this process to assist their students. For instance, many long distances learning industry has boom in this last decade. Therefore, Internet changes teacher role in some realm of studies.

However, in spite of argument above that internet replace teacher role with online course, teacher role still extremely crucial in help students for their learning and guiding. Firstly, many academic studies need teachers in class to further emphasis on lecture and explain all the complex idea, which cannot be done by Internet itself. Secondly, Internet is only a tool to help students to do further research outside the class but they are still need teacher to nurture them to understand their learning process or research assignment. Last but not least, Internet can help to produce a good citizen in society, but teacher can give advice and tell students what is righteous act to do in life.

Lastly, in my opinion, advent in Internet cannot change the role of teacher but to help them improve their teaching process.

In conclusion, Internet can change teacher role because students still need face to face explanation in class, internet on help student research student and internet make student a citizen.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-16 richierich25 77 view
2019-11-12 maniram vicky 69 view
2019-10-04 Roshanip 55 view
2019-10-04 Roshanip 55 view
2019-10-04 Roshanip 61 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'boomed'.
Suggestion: boomed
...ny long distances learning industry has boom in this last decade. Therefore, Interne...
^^^^
Line 5, column 449, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
...ch outside the class but they are still need teacher to nurture them to understand t...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13284132841 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51842247528 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538745387454 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9491554654 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.916666667 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4166666667 7.25397266985 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356182543741 0.242375264174 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152715377092 0.0925447433944 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0979767974141 0.071462118173 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221703031132 0.151781067708 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463844623185 0.0609392437508 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.