As E-books are available online these days, the value of printed books has diminished. Agree or disagree?
Although such topics, in all likelihood, never will yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on whether E-books has diminished the value of printed books can lead to thought-provoking discussion. My view is that irrespective of the numerous arguments that exist on either side, E-books are always cheaper can be carried anywhere. In this essay, I shall present my point of view by considering both sides of the arguments.
There are a number of reasons in favor of my viewpoint. One of them is that E-books always comes in a handy form and in this technological era, we can now read it in mobile, i-pad and also we can store thousands of books on mobile. It can also be observed that we can read it anytime and anywhere as per our wish. Thus, E-books has diminished the printed books is rightly justified.
There are a few aspects of e-books that needed special mentioning. Firstly, compared to the printed books, the data is in the e-books are always latest and if there is an update in the version of the book, then the buyers are given the same updates through e-mail which is not possible in the case of printed books. Thus, the use of E-books has rightly justified.
I see there is potential evidence to support my viewpoint I have provided and hence my opinion is that E-books has diminished the value of the printed books and E-books are very handy to use.
- university should penalize students for late submission for assignments or not. Agree/disagree. 77
- Some people think that Books are losing as a source of information and entertainment Do you agree or disagree 66
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 80
- Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 74
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, do you think cashless society is realistic and why? What are the advantages and disadvantages? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Although such topics, in all likelihood,...
^^^
Line 2, column 42, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'will' and 'yield'.
Suggestion: will never yield
...lthough such topics, in all likelihood, never will yield a consensual agreement, a constructive ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ous arguments that exist on either side, E-books are always cheaper can be carrie...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, so, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1151.0 1207.87684729 95% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7366255144 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70874438511 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526748971193 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 359.1 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.2512250649 50.4703680194 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.636363636 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0909090909 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 7.25397266985 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302456730385 0.242375264174 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129282010998 0.0925447433944 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100630385453 0.071462118173 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209414318737 0.151781067708 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453439532048 0.0609392437508 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.5310837438 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.