In education, is to learn life values and ethics as important to learn practical skills for future development?
Recently, the phenomenon of "in education, to learn life values and ethics is as important as to learn practical skills for future development" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that ethics might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that learning practical skills can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the education standpoint, learning life values and ethics can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that believing in God and being a good person are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of life values. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both learning ethics in education and promoting life values distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of economics science, without the slightest doubt, the lack of learning practical skills for future development might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of unemployment rates. Moreover, fundamental aspects of being an expert can relate to the reality that the demerits of the absence of practical skills can pertain to learning strategies. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of skilled workforce were correlated positively with job opportunities, the local authorities would ultimately address salary problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of future development.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of learning practical skills for future development far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-23 | sattar_iust | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | Dinuka Dissanayaje | 77 | view |
- There is no need of newspapers in modern world To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- In a cashless society people use more credit cards Cashless society seems to be a reality and how realistic do you think it might be What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon 88
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- Some people think human behaviors can be limited by laws others think laws have little effect What is your opinion 77
- n the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
Comments
I think that in any field,…
I think that in any field, practical skills are an indispensable part of training because of their impact on the work process and the success of the task. And in a field like entertainment, knowledge of theory does nothing without the ability to apply that same knowledge in practice. On this occasion I managed to make a small research also in the format of an essay based on works with https://eduzaurus.com/free-essay-samples/entertainment/ and I noticed a tendency of dependence of experience practical to theoretical. And I am sure that in different spheres the proportion varies but the sense remains the same.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75874125874 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23013533272 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608391608392 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.7601718015 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.727272727 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.525350357094 0.242375264174 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180304553672 0.0925447433944 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141822355519 0.071462118173 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296694125261 0.151781067708 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702203600197 0.0609392437508 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 12.6369458128 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.