Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of combining study and employment and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that it will be highly beneficial for students, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the effectiveness of study and work can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, acquiring education while working can provide students with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of becoming self-independent and learning practical experience, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of working and studying at the same time in social and professional life. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both developing financial and communication skills apparently can be seen.
From a realm of educational science, combining study and work might increase the consequences of depression and stressful life. Moreover, fundamental aspects of both study and employment could relate to this reality that the demerits of too much things pertain to make students less productive. As a tangible example, some academic research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of joining both education and work is correlated negatively with less focus on academic subjects. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of working while studying far outweigh its drawback. However, pupils should be prudent enough to have fruitful outcomes of this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | Mohammad1364 | 88 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | namdevjd1 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | njerime | 72 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | shivek | 11 | view |
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. 85
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options and give examples. 85
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 77
- It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past even if it will be expensive to do so. What’s your opinion? 77
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...o this reality that the demerits of too much things pertain to make students less pr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63405797101 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2027407496 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615942028986 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0407472855 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.583333333 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.25397266985 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1316008746 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482178869989 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429696013887 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0770356353353 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249386673025 0.0609392437508 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.