Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree?

Submitted by rajujon on Thu, 10/17/2019 - 08:22

In today's globalized world, Environment pollution should be dealt with seriously by people and the governing bodies. This essay will further argue that 'environmental pollution must be handled by citizens', with relevant arguments and examples.

To begin with, Humans dump the food, electronic, plastic and many other varieties of waste which is also toxic into land and water; furthermore, they are polluting water by toxic chemical fertilizers wherever farming is practiced. In addition, people are not aware of the consequences of environmental pollution because most people are not educated effectively on pollution. People must learn where to dispose of waste safely as well as recycle and reuse the byproduct of waste. For example, People are using plastic materials for a single time use that are non degradable and later dump such waste into land and water.

Secondly, Governing bodies must ensure a clean environment that is currently polluted by clearing all land and water waste periodically. People who are forced to pay heavy income taxes are as well as paying land taxes, which must efficiently be used for society. Furthermore, they have no clear plans in their rule to enforce prevent pollution and create awareness among people. For instance, the recent bureaucracy has disappointed people's expectations by not providing quick relief after the flood in November 2004 in Chennai.

In conclusion, Not only the government but also every individual must consider looking into various ways of curbing environmental pollution. Citizens should undertake the responsibility of creating awareness among society and ensure a clean environment by safe disposal of wastes.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-26 amk79msce 88 view
2020-01-06 manraj123 11 view
2020-01-06 manraj123 11 view
2020-01-03 Ammu helen 55 view
2019-12-30 madhutalaari@gmail.com 65 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic
Essays by user rajujon :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, look, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 20.9802955665 33% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52895752896 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89609264416 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6138996139 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.546299103 50.4703680194 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.333333333 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.25397266985 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10533918765 0.242375264174 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445373099061 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483114034401 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0778401667227 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573244720379 0.0609392437508 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.