Environmental pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Nowadays, the environmental pollution has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether real change can be made at the government level or individuals?”. It is a widely held view that the function of the government to diminish the pollution is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that environmental pollution must be dealt with on both sides.
To begin with, it is a common belief that the government plays a vital role to address the pollution problem. Therefore, I express some reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is that the eco-friendly fuels or renewable source energy, such as solar or electrical energy must be replaced with the detrimental fossil fuels to diminish the toxic gases. Secondly, the government is in charge of encouraging people to leave their defective or private cars at home and use the comprehensive transport system instead. In addition to this information, the beneficial loans must be offered to factories to relocate to less beautiful areas in order to address the side effects of pollution on the destruction of the ozone layer and health problem.
However, undoubtedly that the environmental contamination provides people with various points. it is not rational to lay the blame for environmental pollution just on the government. Moreover, individuals are responsible to eliminate this crisis by using public transport system as well as to participate in the educational session to raise their public awareness about damaging the consequence of environmental pollution.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree that the responsibility of the government to decrease environmental pollution must be taken into consideration. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
- The use of newspaper will be less important in future Do you agree or disagree with this statement Explain with reasons and examples 84
- There are a lot of inventions nowadays, which invention do you think is more important in our day-to-day life. What are the benefits and detrimental effects of it? 77
- Mass media like TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion? 80
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? What are the reasons for that? 85
- Polygamy has led to massive divorce rates around the globe. Give the possible option for this issue and various solutions to reduce the rate. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... the environmental pollution has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...on provides people with various points. it is not rational to lay the blame for en...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, as to, in addition, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 5.75862068966 399% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49158249158 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34106846624 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579124579125 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.803546604 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.916666667 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4166666667 7.25397266985 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256256117629 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854936752513 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824318177878 0.071462118173 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151531261936 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904267907893 0.0609392437508 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.