Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in modern society.” Discuss the solutions to accept this fact.
Recently, the phenomenon of euthanasia in modern society and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the mater of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that euthanasia can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, euthanasia can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the release of painful diseases, as well as decreasing of family interaction with the sick person, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the vital influence of inspiration events resulted from the incurable disease on society. Thus beneficial ramifications of both common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, euthanasia might increase the consequences of critical needs and decline cure expenses. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence it is correct the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of euthanasia in modern society far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-04 | yasamin.gharib62 | 80 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | sant bir singh | 80 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | English time | 55 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | neethujithin | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | neethujithin | 84 | view |
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward to creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or 88
- It is important for school children to study music, art and sport as it is for them to become literature and numerate. How far do you agree with this statement? support your point of view with reasons and / or examples from your own experience. 85
- Children should learn good handwriting, or typing at school, which one is more important? 11
- Effect of internet and social media on young people communication and forming language 88
- Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in modern society.” Discuss the solutions to accept this fact. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... from the incurable disease on society. Thus beneficial ramifications of both common...
^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...orrelated negatively with vital issues. Hence it is correct the preconceived notion o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74117647059 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25885892244 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658823529412 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6966346056 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.090909091 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114468610595 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408461396674 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304329912354 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.065564173458 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173688573958 0.0609392437508 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.16 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.