Function of a university
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among the people on the subjects to be taught in universities. While some people argue that universities should teach subjects which is required in the job market, and some of the people argue that universities should teach subjects which they have interest in. On my point of view, universities should cater both the requirements, in this essay I shall discuss on factors in strengthening my argument.
First and foremost, there are myriad of advantages in university education. For example universities have to update their syllabus according to the market trends, if not the validity of the qualification will be deteriorated. Moreover, universities should make available courses related to technical sciences because there are lucrative opportunities available in the job market. In addition, universities can promote aesthetic subjects among their students, since entertainment business is one of the best businesses in this current context.
On the other hand, some people argue that universities should teach subjects in which the students have interests in, but on my point of view it is impractical for all the countries depending on the resources available in. For instance, if students have interest in space sciences, third world countries may not have sufficient resources to cater their requirements. Consequantely, though this approch is fair there are lot of practicle issues involved in this approach.
In conclusion, it is recommended to introduce new courses to universities after carrying out market researches in the job market together with sufficient theoratical and practical knowledge. It is also believed that government bear a huge responsibility in providing higher education opportunities to the younger generation because expenditure borne on education is considered as a investment for the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | gupta-vikas | 81 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | gupta-vikas | 62 | view |
- Some people only have pets to not feel lonely, for example, but they don’t always take proper care of them. Do you think people who don’t always take proper care of their pets should be allowed to keep them? 85
- Investing in Science 72
- The time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life. How widespread is the problem? What problem will this shortage of time cause? 77
- Some people prefer to be nocturnal during exam days and go through the entire syllabus in the last few days, whereas others have regular habits, studying a little every day.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both studying patterns and choose whic 77
- Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics, and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...hich is required in the job market, and some of the people argue that universities should t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 381, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ure borne on education is considered as a investment for the future.
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, then, third, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61888111888 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24850767169 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 505.8 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3636912892 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.916666667 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0833333333 7.25397266985 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17618154301 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735493240603 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570677993291 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112507303779 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617054413406 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.