Gerontologists, people who study the process of ageing, are getting closer to finding a way to increase the human lifespan significantly. They claim that within the next few decades humans may be live for 500 years or more.
would living for 500 years have positive or negative impacts on the world?
Since the beginning of the 21st century, gerontologists have been investigating a new technique which could be used to increase the human lifespan. Some people believe that increasing the lifespan of human up to 500 years has a positive impact, while others argue that people will suffer from this invention. This essay will discuss the reason why extending the lifespan of human is dangerous and could lead to wars and conflicts.
Increasing the lifespan of human up to 500 years has a negative impact on the world because there is not enough sources to feed them and this will lead to wars and conflicts. Increasing the human lifespan means that number of people who will live on the earth surface will increase significantly and countries will response to this increment through making wars to cover the food lacking. Recent research, which was conducted in the Cambridge university, has shown that governments will face a food problem if the human lifespan increased up to 500 years, and wars will be the only solution to cover this need. Therefore, it seems clear that increasing the human lifespan has a negative impact on the world.
On the other hand, some people think that increasing the human lifespan will enable researchers to complete their long term studies, which may extend to 100 years. Enabling people to live longer help scientists to know the results of their researches. But these people are unaware of the fact that governments will face a problem of feeding their people, which consequently will cause wars and conflicts. Thus increasing the human lifespan is very danger and affects on the world negatively.
In conclusion, this essay discussed the reason why increasing the human lifespan is a bad idea and it leads to wars and conflicts. In my opinion, I am inclined to believe that extending the people lifespan affects on the world negatively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-20 | jyotikumari042 | 72 | view |
| 2018-06-19 | Manisha Verma | 77 | view |
| 2018-04-06 | halbouni1984 | 70 | view |
- Urban sprawl is an increasing issue around the world. One way in which to solve this issue is to construct cities verically rather than horizontally. Are such cities a good idea? 72
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers to not over-package products in the first place?Choose which side you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view w 72
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 76
- Team sports are generally promoted as a great way to keep fit and build character. However, sporting events such as soccer matches are often accompanied by violence between rival supporters and other forms of antisocial behavior. If sporting events can le 76
- Television has two roles: to inform and to entertain. Explain which of these roles you see as more important. To what extent do you think that TV today performs each of these roles in an effective way? Support your point of view with details from your own 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fespan affects on the world negatively.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 313.0 242.827586207 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01277955272 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67026911518 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463258785942 0.580463131201 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 466.2 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3117480573 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.692307692 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 2.75862068966 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234579210004 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106155121174 0.0925447433944 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459834480013 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161198262892 0.151781067708 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046968804014 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.1260098522 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.32886699507 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.