As global trade increases between different countries, many daily necessities are produced in other countries. Such goods are usually transported a long distance. Do the benefits of this trend outweigh its drawbacks?
Trading has always been onus of Government to keep up the GDP growth rate, it also helps to influx international money. Said this let delve into to know the better prospect of each.
We should be avoiding transportation of goods that can be cultivated locally within the country. Authorities must look into the brighter prospect of it, as this will improvise global development by providing more factory setup, facilitating more jobs, and hence yielding promising economic and social upliftment. Although, it is not pragmatic for all countries to follow this revolutionary method. For example, Syria it has to live on the import of good, many Middle east countries where vegetation is dearth need to export oil to import food and vegetables.
Trading has been into our society and culture from ancient period, where goods were traded in exchange of goods, or for some valuable stones, those were unavailable in certain geographical locations. Later, this process took the form of market and now we have World Trade Centre. As said, this is beneficial because we are living in a world that is shrinking and availability of many fossil elements are dearth. We need medicine, food, and above all fossil fuels. So, it is always better to import/export these goods which are dearth or cannot be produce due to geographical limitation across countries.
I advocate to the fact that, albeit, we outweigh the drawback of transportation of goods but the benefits we are served with are more promising.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-29 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
| 2019-08-27 | edsonsimoes | 72 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | bashob | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | bashob | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-22 | venkatesh1018 | 72 | view |
- The claim that animals have rights has been subjected as a matter of debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? 77
- The claim that animals have rights has been subjected as a matter of debate since the 1970’s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? 77
- As global trade increases between different countries, many daily necessities are produced in other countries. Such goods are usually transported a long distance. Do the benefits of this trend outweigh its drawbacks? 77
- Assessment of student performance using formal methods like a written formal examination. Give your point 88
- Fast food has become a part of our society. What is the impact of fast food on human life? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...graphical locations. Later, this process took the form of market and now we have ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 246.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10162601626 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81594670048 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642276422764 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.65517241379 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1999887082 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.583333333 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 7.25397266985 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156195083993 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513135570302 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028802828951 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880145704114 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303200049978 0.0609392437508 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.