A good listener is better than a good talker in a social situation. Do you agree or disagree?
It has long been a subject of discussion whether a good listener is better than a good talker in a social situation or not. In my opinion, the former notion has several elements that deserve attention and I will explain why using pertinent arguments.
There are myriad of arguments in favor of my context and the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that people should be extra careful with their decisions. For example, according to a recent survey done by the Stanford University, 45% people benefit from the above mentioned notion, whereas 30% people face disadvantages duo to it. Hence, it is apparent why many citizens are in favor of the above stance.
Another argument in support of my view is that governments worldwide have become more active in dealing with this situation. To illustrate, as per recent academic research carried out by the Australian government, 60% citizens gained immensely from the proposed government reforms. They improved their existing scenario tremendously and that paved the way for a better economic future. Therefore not only will this make people more careful and pragmatic in their approach, but also will it lead to a better living standard.
From what has been discussed above, it is clear that the benefits of given the topic significantly outweigh the drawbacks. Lastly, in my opinion, it would be wise to say a good listener is better than a good talker in a social situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-31 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-05-24 | Sridarani | 69 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2024-01-22 | topraveesh | 88 | view |
- living in the countryside or having an urban life 87
- environment with rubbish 85
- Healthy diet is more important to keep fit than exercise Do you agree or disagree 55
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in developing countries? 55
- More information available online so library books are useless Agree or disagree with statement 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 386, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...d the way for a better economic future. Therefore not only will this make people more car...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, lastly, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00836820084 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7330151911 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610878661088 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6029887092 50.4703680194 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.818181818 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222547948502 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903796272566 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.176188012904 0.071462118173 247% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166507125376 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151219594704 0.0609392437508 248% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 82.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 74.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.