Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree
The importance of reducing investments in art, music and painting was always a debatable topic. Many people argue that it would lead to myriad of concerns. In my opinion, I completely disagree with the statement and this step should be rejected. The following essay would further elaborate the reasons why government should not reduce investing in fine arts with clear reasons and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
Firstly, one of the main debate going on in today's world is reducing yearly financial budget on fine arts including painting and music by the government. The most important fact is that these various forms of arts are vital for the growth of nation. Government need to support the survival and thrive of these arts. Music and painting not only induce discipline but can also give them chance to grow in these field nationally as well as internationally.
Secondly, arts have a vital connection with the cultural identity of the nation. If an art disappears, the whole way of life will disappear with it and we will lose the rich cultural diversity. Another pivotal aspect of the argument is that music and painting are two varied medium of expressing the emotions and this sector deserve the investment to acquire desired development. For example, Australian government has invested 30% of its budget to support fine arts in the year 2017. As a result, improvement in people artistic has increased from 10% to 40%. This example exemplifies us why many people are in favor of dedicating the hefty amount of money in fine arts.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to conclusion that the benefits of investing in the field of art are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-31 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-05-24 | Sridarani | 69 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2024-01-22 | topraveesh | 88 | view |
- technology and new inventions is it beneficial or detrimental to the society? 95
- Medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy Is it blessing or curse 67
- More information available online so library s book are useless or As e books are available online these days the value of printed books has diminished Agree or disagree 89
- Which should require more financial support from the government Health or education To what extend do you agree or not Use your experience 84
- The importance of cars and aeroplane in modern life Give examples 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9756097561 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76076506504 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578397212544 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1222594643 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20906388262 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649053110804 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595096179674 0.071462118173 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119070488562 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682956382189 0.0609392437508 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 12.6369458128 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.