A government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Never before had there been such staggering discussion regarding the money spend by government on railways and roads. In the popular perceptions, money spend on railways brings palpable benefits not only to the society but also the environment. Yet, some people believed that benefits of spending money on expanding the roads outweigh the investment on public transport. In this essay, I will elaborate how developing public transport improve people well being and how building more roads wreak havoc the environment.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why public transports such as railways are imperative to society and the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that public transport reduce people time spend on travelling and also it is convenient for everyone in the society. To exemplify, people from different ages and with different income level are affordable and allow to take the public transport, which means everyone can travel to any places even without driving license and high disposable income. Hence, public transport should be encouraged to invest by public as it brings substantial benefits to people well being.
Another justification for upholding this notion is that the car and other types of vehicle use on roads bring colossal harms to the environment which could be alleviated by building more public transport. As an illustration, the vehicle such as truck, car and motorcycle emit harmful substance to the air, which caused air pollution that detrimental to human health. In order to stop this situation that damage the environment, replacement of public transport is the ideal solution. Thus, spend money on building road is definitely unwise to continue.
Based on the discussion above, the benefit of developing public transport is prominent and should be emphasized by the government, whereas, the road construction should be reduced to avoid cost the society.
- People often go to developed countries for higher studies because they believe that this gives them a better platform to become competent in the international arena. How far you agree with this statement? 55
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh this disadvantages? 55
- Obesity is a serious problem in many countries, especially in rich countries. Discuss ways to solve the problem. Provide specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 55
- A government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Obesity is a serious problem in many countries, especially in rich countries. Discuss ways to solve the problem. Provide specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Never before had there been such stagger...
^^^
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Never' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
Never before had there been such staggering d...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e roads wreak havoc the environment. At the outset, there are numerous reason...
^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'taking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: taking
...t income level are affordable and allow to take the public transport, which means every...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntial benefits to people well being. Another justification for upholding this...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d is definitely unwise to continue. Based on the discussion above, the benef...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, regarding, so, thus, well, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36666666667 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81660946687 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553333333333 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.5545277683 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.166666667 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11264066452 0.242375264174 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576514007172 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678509769277 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0758915478325 0.151781067708 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575835266701 0.0609392437508 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.