Governments promise continuous economic growth, but it is actually illusion. Some people think that governments should abandon this. Give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of promising the governments to develop the economy and the advice to abandon this decision and its correspondig impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although this advice is beneficial as it is regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponent views. I am inclined to believe that this idea can be plus as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, the idea of the governments' motto to boost the economy and the opinion based on leaving it provides the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact of development. From my own experience, when I was a university pupil, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the all aspects of this idea. Firstly, diminishing the role of governments in economy leads to increasing the role of private sectors and we will have a dynamic market. Hence, by developing industries, markets and private businesses, the economic growth will occur. Furthermore, loads of economists and the most well-known one which is called Adam Smith asserted that governments can damage the balance between the supply and demand in the market.
On the one hand, there is no doubt that the idea of declining the governments' allowances and decisions in economy and render this issue to the private sectors has some opponents. According to research undertaken by a prestigious university, governments have a considerable amount of money and resources in each country and some economic activities are heavily depend on the government contribution.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the merits of reducing the role of governments in economy and abandoning it are far more outweigh their demerits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-02 | bashirheidari | 85 | view |
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss 88
- Whether or not experiential learning can work well in formal education. Do you think experiential learning is beneficial in high schools and colleges? 11
- Do you think that place where a person grew has an influence on his accomplishments? Explain for example. Does region affect successful people? 77
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- It is a foolish idea to get married before finishing the study and settling down. Agree or not? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...om a social standpoint, the idea of the governments motto to boost the economy and the opin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...nd some economic activities are heavily depend on the government contribution. In c...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...overnments in economy and abandoning it are far more outweigh their demerits.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, so, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31379310345 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04533521757 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565517241379 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.9388161731 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.090909091 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243878908234 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873618012604 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480489070394 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141364852081 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446234166596 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.