Governments promise continuous economic growths, but it’s actually an illusion. Some people think that governments should abandon this. Please talk about the validity and the implications.
In modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people on government's promise on continuous economic growth. While, some people claim it is a truth, on my point of view it is an illusion and they should abandon this concept. In this essay, I shall discuss on the validity of the argumnet and it's implications.
First and foremost, I will define what economic growth is. It can be measured in monetary terms mainly but we can use qualitative aspects to derive the economic growth of a country. For example, in most cases Gross Domestic Product is used as the measurement in deriving the economic growth. However, constanat economic growth is an illusion because it will vary on other factors such as weather conditions, diseases and etc.
On the other hand, some people beleive in politicians and expect for continuous economic growth which is an unachievable task. Moreover, governments satisfy people with short term subsidies and make them to forget on long term economic stability of the country. Therefore, governments can invest more on infrastructure and education to acheive long term sustainability.
In conclusion, governments bear the ultimate responsibility of improving the life quality of their population through steady economic growth. It is also beleived, that governments should get the contribution from the private sector in acheiving their long term plans. Governments can impose tax holidays to encourage private entreprenuership consequently, they can earn high income tax revenue from these businesses. Finally, the society as a whole has to work towards in acheiving continuous economic growth without making it an illusion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-31 | Maheswari | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | engr.sajjad55@gmail.com | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-19 | Nasir-RZN | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-18 | neelu sharma | 77 | view |
- It is generally accepted that families are not as close as they used to be. Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together. Include any relevant examples from your experience. 73
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the International music that is heard everywhere nowadays? 73
- The kind of a person s life depends on his her personality What s your opinion of this and use your own experience as examples 93
- Technology allows us to have usefulness and interesting life than in past? Do you agree or disagree? 80
- "Fatherhood ought to be emphasised as much as motherhood. The idea that women are solely responsible for deciding whether or not to have babies leads on to the idea that they are also responsible for bringing the children up."To what extent do y 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...its implications. First and foremost, I will define what economic growth is. I...
^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...rs such as weather conditions, diseases and etc. On the other hand, some people belei...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... revenue from these businesses. Finally, the society as a whole has to work towar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, in most cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06810274239 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.2288652202 50.4703680194 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.285714286 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 7.25397266985 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294388308955 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10374585755 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677423033701 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195519770003 0.151781067708 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111415762548 0.0609392437508 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.